<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DNS Archives - Linuxcent</title>
	<atom:link href="https://linuxcent.com/tag/dns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://linuxcent.com/tag/dns/</link>
	<description>Infrastructure security, from the kernel up.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 03:36:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">211632295</site>	<item>
		<title>DNS at the Kernel Level — What Your Pods Are Actually Resolving</title>
		<link>https://linuxcent.com/ebpf-dns-observability-kubernetes/</link>
					<comments>https://linuxcent.com/ebpf-dns-observability-kubernetes/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vamshi Krishna Santhapuri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[eBPF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoreDNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kubernetes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tracing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://linuxcent.com/?p=1840</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><span class="span-reading-time rt-reading-time" style="display: block;"><span class="rt-label rt-prefix">Reading Time: </span> <span class="rt-time"> 9</span> <span class="rt-label rt-postfix">minutes</span></span>DNS observability Kubernetes needs eBPF tracepoints, not CoreDNS metrics — trace every pod DNS query in real time with no sidecar, restart, or sampling.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://linuxcent.com/ebpf-dns-observability-kubernetes/">DNS at the Kernel Level — What Your Pods Are Actually Resolving</a> appeared first on <a href="https://linuxcent.com">Linuxcent</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<span class="span-reading-time rt-reading-time" style="display: block;"><span class="rt-label rt-prefix">Reading Time: </span> <span class="rt-time"> 9</span> <span class="rt-label rt-postfix">minutes</span></span><style>
pre{position:relative;background:#1e1e1e;color:#d4d4d4;
    padding:16px 16px 16px 20px;border-radius:6px;overflow-x:auto;
    font-family:'JetBrains Mono','Fira Code','Cascadia Code',Consolas,'Courier New',monospace;
    font-size:.88em;line-height:1.6;border-left:4px solid #555}
code{background:#f4f4f4;padding:2px 5px;border-radius:3px;font-size:.9em}
pre code{background:transparent;padding:0;color:inherit}
pre[data-lang="bash"],pre[data-lang="sh"],
pre[data-lang="shell"],pre[data-lang="zsh"]{border-left-color:#4ec9b0}
pre[data-lang="yaml"],pre[data-lang="json"],
pre[data-lang="toml"],pre[data-lang="xml"]{border-left-color:#569cd6}
pre[data-lang="python"],pre[data-lang="go"],pre[data-lang="rust"],
pre[data-lang="java"],pre[data-lang="c"],pre[data-lang="cpp"]{border-left-color:#c586c0}
pre[data-lang="text"],pre[data-lang="output"],
pre[data-lang="console"]{border-left-color:#888}
.lc-copy-btn{position:absolute;top:8px;right:8px;background:#2d2d2d;color:#ccc;
    border:1px solid #444;border-radius:4px;padding:3px 9px;font-size:.75em;
    font-family:system-ui,sans-serif;cursor:pointer;opacity:0;
    transition:opacity .15s,background .15s;line-height:1.6}
pre:hover .lc-copy-btn{opacity:1}
.lc-copy-btn:hover{background:#3a3a3a;color:#fff}
.lc-copy-btn.copied{color:#4ec9b0;border-color:#4ec9b0}
.lc-lang-badge{position:absolute;top:8px;left:20px;font-family:system-ui,sans-serif;
    font-size:.7em;color:#666;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:.04em;
    line-height:1;pointer-events:none;opacity:0;transition:opacity .15s}
pre:hover .lc-lang-badge{opacity:1}
table{border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;margin:16px 0}
th,td{border:1px solid #ddd;padding:10px 14px;text-align:left}
th{background:#f0f0f0;font-weight:600}
tr:nth-child(even){background:#fafafa}
</style>
<p><script>
(function(){
  if(window.__lcCodeEnhanced)return;
  window.__lcCodeEnhanced=true;
  function enhance(){
    document.querySelectorAll('pre').forEach(function(pre){
      var code=pre.querySelector('code');
      var lang='';
      if(code){var m=(code.className||'').match(/language-(\S+)/);if(m)lang=m[1].toLowerCase();}
      if(lang)pre.setAttribute('data-lang',lang);
      if(lang){var badge=document.createElement('span');badge.className='lc-lang-badge';badge.textContent=lang;pre.insertBefore(badge,pre.firstChild);}
      var btn=document.createElement('button');
      btn.className='lc-copy-btn';btn.textContent='Copy';btn.setAttribute('aria-label','Copy code to clipboard');
      pre.appendChild(btn);
      btn.addEventListener('click',function(){
        var text=code?code.innerText:pre.innerText;
        if(navigator.clipboard&&window.isSecureContext){
          navigator.clipboard.writeText(text).then(function(){ok(btn);}).catch(function(){fb(text,btn);});
        }else{fb(text,btn);}
      });
    });
  }
  function ok(btn){btn.textContent='Copied!';btn.classList.add('copied');setTimeout(function(){btn.textContent='Copy';btn.classList.remove('copied');},2000);}
  function fb(text,btn){
    try{var ta=document.createElement('textarea');ta.value=text;ta.style.cssText='position:fixed;left:-9999px;top:-9999px;opacity:0';document.body.appendChild(ta);ta.select();document.execCommand('copy');document.body.removeChild(ta);ok(btn);}
    catch(e){btn.textContent='✗ Failed';setTimeout(function(){btn.textContent='Copy';},2000);}
  }
  if(document.readyState==='loading'){document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',enhance);}else{enhance();}
})();
</script></p>
<p><em>eBPF: From Kernel to Cloud, Episode 11</em><br />
<a href="/what-is-ebpf-linux-kubernetes/">What Is eBPF?</a> · <a href="/bpf-verifier-kubernetes-safety/">The BPF Verifier</a> · <a href="/ebpf-vs-kernel-modules-kubernetes/">eBPF vs Kernel Modules</a> · <a href="/ebpf-program-types-kubernetes/">eBPF Program Types</a> · <a href="/ebpf-maps-explained/">eBPF Maps</a> · <a href="/ebpf-co-re-libbpf-portable-programs/">CO-RE and libbpf</a> · <a href="/ebpf-xdp-kubernetes-networking/">XDP</a> · <a href="/tc-ebpf-kubernetes-network-policy/">TC eBPF</a> · <a href="/bpftrace-kernel-observability/">bpftrace</a> · <a href="/ebpf-network-flow-observability/">Network Flow Observability</a> · <strong>DNS Observability</strong></p>
<hr />
<h2 id="tldr">TL;DR</h2>
<ul>
<li>DNS observability in Kubernetes with eBPF hooks the kernel&#8217;s DNS syscall path — giving you per-pod query visibility without sidecars, restarts, or CoreDNS log scraping<br />
  <em>(tracepoint = a stable, versioned hook placed deliberately in the Linux kernel source; unlike kprobes, tracepoints survive kernel upgrades without breakage)</em></li>
<li>CoreDNS metrics tell you aggregate query rates; eBPF tracepoints tell you which pod queried what domain, when, and what was returned</li>
<li>A compromised workload&#8217;s first observable action is almost always an unexpected DNS query — infrastructure no legitimate process should ever resolve</li>
<li>The DNS syscall path in Linux goes: application calls <code class="" data-line="">getaddrinfo()</code> → glibc → <code class="" data-line="">sendto()</code> syscall → kernel network stack → UDP packet to CoreDNS resolver</li>
<li>You hook the <code class="" data-line="">sendto</code> tracepoint to catch the query leaving the pod and the <code class="" data-line="">recvfrom</code> tracepoint to catch the response arriving</li>
<li>Production note: DNS query payloads cross the kernel as raw UDP — parsing the DNS wire format in a bpftrace one-liner requires reading past the UDP header; Tetragon and Pixie do this parsing in the eBPF program itself</li>
</ul>
<hr />
<p>EP10 showed eBPF flow telemetry as the ground truth for what connections your pods are making. DNS observability with eBPF goes one layer beneath that: the name resolution step that happens before any connection is established. Every domain a pod resolves is visible at the kernel level. That visibility is what a security scan alert is missing when it flags &#8220;unexpected DNS queries&#8221; — it can see the traffic on the wire, but it can&#8217;t tell you which pod sent it without restarting or deploying an agent into the pod.</p>
<h2 id="quick-check-what-dns-traffic-is-leaving-your-pods-right-now">Quick Check: What DNS Traffic Is Leaving Your Pods Right Now?</h2>
<p>Without installing anything, you can see DNS queries crossing any node in under 30 seconds:</p>
<pre><code class="" data-line=""># SSH into a worker node, then:

# Watch all UDP port 53 traffic — which processes are making DNS queries?
bpftrace -e &#039;
tracepoint:syscalls:sys_enter_sendto {
    $port = (uint16)((uint8*)args-&gt;addr)[3] &lt;&lt; 8 |
            (uint16)((uint8*)args-&gt;addr)[2];
    if ($port == 53) {
        printf(&quot;%-20s %-6d DNS query (UDP sendto)\n&quot;, comm, pid);
    }
}&#039; --timeout 30
</code></pre>
<p>Expected output:</p>
<pre><code class="" data-line="">coredns              1842   DNS query (UDP sendto)   # ← CoreDNS forwarding upstream
nginx                9231   DNS query (UDP sendto)   # ← nginx resolving upstream
payment-svc          11043  DNS query (UDP sendto)   # ← your service making queries
curl                 14829  DNS query (UDP sendto)   # ← kubectl exec / debug session
</code></pre>
<pre><code class="" data-line=""># How many DNS queries per process in the last 30 seconds?
bpftrace -e &#039;
tracepoint:syscalls:sys_enter_sendto {
    $port = (uint16)((uint8*)args-&gt;addr)[3] &lt;&lt; 8 |
            (uint16)((uint8*)args-&gt;addr)[2];
    if ($port == 53) { @dns_queries[comm] = count(); }
}
interval:s:30 { print(@dns_queries); exit(); }
&#039;
</code></pre>
<p>Expected output:</p>
<pre><code class="" data-line="">@dns_queries[coredns]:       1203   # ← upstream forwarder traffic
@dns_queries[payment-svc]:    847   # ← legitimate service queries
@dns_queries[unknown]:         12   # ← investigate this one
</code></pre>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>On EKS or GKE managed nodes:</strong> You may not be able to SSH directly to worker nodes, but you can run a privileged debug pod: <code class="" data-line="">kubectl debug node/&lt;node-name&gt; -it --image=quay.io/iovisor/bpftrace</code>. The bpftrace program runs on the host kernel and sees all pods&#8217; DNS queries. GKE Autopilot restricts privileged pods — use GKE&#8217;s built-in eBPF-based DNS observability instead (enabled via Cloud Logging with DNS policy logging).</p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<p>A security scan flagged unexpected DNS queries from <code class="" data-line="">payment-svc</code> in the production namespace. The query domains didn&#8217;t match anything in the service&#8217;s known dependency list. The scan tool showed the traffic on the wire — destination port 53, from the pod&#8217;s IP — but couldn&#8217;t tell us which process inside the pod was responsible or what domain was being queried without pulling the pod&#8217;s DNS logs.</p>
<p>The pod had no DNS logging enabled. CoreDNS showed the queries in its aggregate metrics but with no attribution below namespace level. Restarting the pod to add a DNS sidecar would wipe any in-memory state the process had accumulated.</p>
<p>I ran bpftrace with a <code class="" data-line="">recvfrom</code> hook to catch the DNS response payloads coming back into the pod:</p>
<pre><code class="" data-line="">bpftrace -e &#039;
tracepoint:syscalls:sys_exit_recvfrom {
    if (retval &gt; 0) {
        printf(&quot;%-20s PID %-6d received %d bytes (possible DNS response)\n&quot;,
               comm, pid, retval);
    }
}&#039; --timeout 60
</code></pre>
<p>Then cross-referenced the PIDs to container processes via <code class="" data-line="">/proc/&lt;pid&gt;/cgroup</code>. The unexpected queries were coming from a sidecar process that had been injected by a recent Helm chart change — not from the main application container at all. A misconfigured Datadog agent injected into the wrong namespace was querying its intake endpoint.</p>
<p>No restart. No sidecar deployment. Found in under two minutes.</p>
<hr />
<h2 id="why-coredns-metrics-dont-give-you-this">Why CoreDNS Metrics Don&#8217;t Give You This</h2>
<p>CoreDNS exposes DNS query metrics via Prometheus. Those metrics tell you:<br />
&#8211; Total queries per second across the cluster<br />
&#8211; Query latency histograms<br />
&#8211; Error rates (NXDOMAIN, SERVFAIL)<br />
&#8211; Upstream forwarder health</p>
<p>What they don&#8217;t tell you:<br />
&#8211; Which specific pod sent a query to a specific domain<br />
&#8211; Which process inside that pod made the <code class="" data-line="">getaddrinfo()</code> call<br />
&#8211; Whether the query came from the main container or an injected sidecar<br />
&#8211; The timing relationship between a DNS query and the connection that followed it</p>
<p>CoreDNS sees the query after it arrives at the resolver. eBPF tracepoints see the query at the moment the pod&#8217;s process issues the <code class="" data-line="">sendto()</code> syscall — before it leaves the node. The difference is attribution.</p>
<hr />
<h2 id="the-dns-syscall-path-in-linux">The DNS Syscall Path in Linux</h2>
<p>Understanding where the hook fires helps you reason about what you can observe:</p>
<pre><code class="" data-line="">Application code
    ↓
getaddrinfo(&quot;api.example.com&quot;) ← glibc resolver function
    ↓
glibc reads /etc/resolv.conf → finds nameserver 10.96.0.10 (CoreDNS ClusterIP)
    ↓
glibc builds DNS wire-format query packet
    ↓
sendto(sockfd, buf, len, 0, &amp;resolver_addr, addrlen)
    ↓                     ← eBPF tracepoint fires here: sys_enter_sendto
Linux kernel: udp_sendmsg()
    ↓
Packet leaves pod veth interface
    ↓
TC eBPF on veth sees UDP packet (flow telemetry picks this up too)
    ↓
CoreDNS receives query, resolves, sends response
    ↓
Packet arrives back at pod veth
    ↓
recvfrom(sockfd, buf, len, 0, &amp;src_addr, &amp;src_len)
    ↓                     ← eBPF tracepoint fires here: sys_exit_recvfrom
glibc parses DNS response
    ↓
getaddrinfo() returns IP addresses to application
</code></pre>
<blockquote>
<p><strong><code class="" data-line="">getaddrinfo</code></strong> — the standard POSIX function applications call to resolve a hostname to IP addresses. It lives in glibc, not in the kernel. The kernel never sees the domain name string directly — it only sees the UDP packet carrying the DNS wire-format query. To read the actual domain name in an eBPF program, you parse the DNS packet payload at the <code class="" data-line="">sendto</code> tracepoint.</p>
<p><strong><code class="" data-line="">tracepoint</code></strong> — a stable, versioned hook deliberately placed in Linux kernel source code by kernel developers. Unlike kprobes (which attach to arbitrary kernel functions and break when those functions change), tracepoints are part of the kernel&#8217;s stable interface. The <code class="" data-line="">syscalls:sys_enter_sendto</code> tracepoint has been present and stable since kernel 3.x. You can rely on it across Ubuntu 20.04 through the latest kernels without version checks.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<h2 id="reading-dns-queries-at-the-tracepoint">Reading DNS Queries at the Tracepoint</h2>
<p>The <code class="" data-line="">sendto</code> tracepoint fires when any process sends data on a socket. Filtering to port 53 gives you DNS queries. Parsing the payload gives you the domain name.</p>
<p>The DNS wire format for a query:</p>
<pre><code class="" data-line="">Bytes 0-11:   DNS header (12 bytes)
              - Transaction ID (2 bytes)
              - Flags (2 bytes)
              - QDCount, ANCount, NSCount, ARCount (2 bytes each)
Byte 12+:     Question section
              - QNAME (variable length, label-encoded)
              - QTYPE (2 bytes)
              - QCLASS (2 bytes)
</code></pre>
<p>The QNAME is length-prefixed labels: <code class="" data-line="">\x03api\x07example\x03com\x00</code> for <code class="" data-line="">api.example.com</code>. bpftrace can read the raw bytes but parsing label encoding inline in a one-liner is awkward. For raw query detection (flag any DNS query from a specific process), the tracepoint is enough:</p>
<pre><code class="" data-line=""># Watch DNS queries from a specific process name — replace &quot;payment-svc&quot;
bpftrace -e &#039;
tracepoint:syscalls:sys_enter_sendto /comm == &quot;payment-svc&quot;/ {
    printf(&quot;PID %-6d sending %d bytes to DNS\n&quot;, pid, args-&gt;len);
}
&#039;
</code></pre>
<p>For full domain name extraction, use a tool that implements DNS wire-format parsing in its eBPF layer. Tetragon and Pixie both do this. On a Tetragon-instrumented cluster:</p>
<pre><code class="" data-line=""># Watch DNS queries with domain names — Tetragon (all pods)
kubectl exec -n kube-system -it $(kubectl get pod -n kube-system -l app.kubernetes.io/name=tetragon -o name | head -1) \
  -- tetra getevents --event-types PROCESS_KPROBE \
  | grep -i dns
</code></pre>
<p>Sample Tetragon output:</p>
<pre><code class="" data-line="">{
  &quot;process&quot;: {
    &quot;pod&quot;: {&quot;name&quot;: &quot;payment-svc-7d4b9f-xk2p1&quot;, &quot;namespace&quot;: &quot;production&quot;},
    &quot;binary&quot;: &quot;/usr/bin/payment-service&quot;,
    &quot;pid&quot;: 11043
  },
  &quot;function_name&quot;: &quot;__sys_sendto&quot;,
  &quot;args&quot;: [
    {&quot;sock_arg&quot;: {&quot;family&quot;: &quot;AF_INET&quot;, &quot;protocol&quot;: &quot;UDP&quot;,
                  &quot;daddr&quot;: &quot;10.96.0.10&quot;, &quot;dport&quot;: 53}},
    {&quot;bytes_arg&quot;: &quot;&lt;DNS query for metrics.datadoghq.com&gt;&quot;}
  ]
}
</code></pre>
<p>Pod name, namespace, binary, PID, and the domain being queried — all from a kernel tracepoint, no sidecar, no pod restart.</p>
<hr />
<h2 id="building-pod-level-dns-attribution-without-tetragon">Building Pod-Level DNS Attribution Without Tetragon</h2>
<p>If you&#8217;re not running Tetragon, you can build pod-level attribution from the PID. When bpftrace reports a PID making a DNS query, map it to a container:</p>
<pre><code class="" data-line=""># Get the PID from bpftrace, then:
PID=11043

# Which cgroup does this PID belong to? (maps to container/pod)
cat /proc/$PID/cgroup | grep kubepods
# 12:cpu:/kubepods/burstable/pod3f8a21bc-4e7d-4b91-a3c2-8b947f6e3d12/a4c8f1e2b3d4...
# The pod UID is embedded: pod3f8a21bc-4e7d-4b91-a3c2-8b947f6e3d12

# Map pod UID to pod name
kubectl get pods -A -o jsonpath=&#039;{range .items[*]}{.metadata.uid}{&quot; &quot;}{.metadata.name}{&quot; &quot;}{.metadata.namespace}{&quot;\n&quot;}{end}&#039; \
  | grep 3f8a21bc-4e7d-4b91-a3c2-8b947f6e3d12
# 3f8a21bc-4e7d-4b91-a3c2-8b947f6e3d12  payment-svc-7d4b9f-xk2p1  production
</code></pre>
<p>That&#8217;s the full chain: kernel tracepoint → host PID → cgroup path → pod UID → pod name + namespace. Automatable. No agents required inside the pod.</p>
<hr />
<h2 id="detecting-anomalous-dns-what-to-watch-for">Detecting Anomalous DNS: What to Watch For</h2>
<p>DNS is the first observable action in most attack chains. A process that has been compromised or injected typically cannot establish a C2 connection without first resolving the C2 domain.</p>
<p>Signals worth watching at the kernel DNS layer:</p>
<p><strong>Queries to non-cluster domains from unexpected processes</strong></p>
<pre><code class="" data-line=""># Flag any DNS query to a non-cluster domain (not .cluster.local or .svc.cluster.local)
bpftrace -e &#039;
tracepoint:syscalls:sys_enter_sendto {
    $port = (uint16)((uint8*)args-&gt;addr)[3] &lt;&lt; 8 |
            (uint16)((uint8*)args-&gt;addr)[2];
    if ($port == 53) {
        printf(&quot;%-20s %-6d DNS sendto\n&quot;, comm, pid);
    }
}&#039; --timeout 60
</code></pre>
<p><strong>High-frequency DNS queries from a single process</strong> (DNS tunneling fingerprint)</p>
<pre><code class="" data-line=""># Processes making more than N DNS queries per second
bpftrace -e &#039;
tracepoint:syscalls:sys_enter_sendto {
    $port = (uint16)((uint8*)args-&gt;addr)[3] &lt;&lt; 8 |
            (uint16)((uint8*)args-&gt;addr)[2];
    if ($port == 53) { @[pid, comm] = count(); }
}
interval:s:1 {
    print(@);
    clear(@);
}
&#039;
</code></pre>
<p>DNS tunneling exfiltrates data by encoding it in subdomains of queries. A process making 50+ DNS queries per second to varied subdomains of the same parent domain is a strong signal. CoreDNS aggregate metrics will show elevated query volume; the kernel tracepoint tells you which PID is responsible.</p>
<p><strong>Queries immediately followed by a connection</strong> (normal vs anomalous pattern)</p>
<p>Legitimate services resolve a known set of domains. A process that resolves a new, never-before-seen domain and immediately opens a TCP connection to the returned IP is structurally different from normal service behavior. The combination of DNS tracepoint + TCP connect kprobe lets you correlate these events by PID and timestamp — without any application instrumentation.</p>
<hr />
<h2 id="production-gotchas"><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/26a0.png" alt="⚠" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> Production Gotchas</h2>
<p><strong>DNS payload parsing is not trivial in bpftrace.</strong> Reading the domain name from the UDP payload requires byte-level parsing of the DNS wire format inside an eBPF program. bpftrace can read raw bytes with <code class="" data-line="">buf()</code>, but the label-encoded domain name format requires a loop that the verifier may reject for complexity reasons. Tools like Tetragon and Pixie implement this parsing in C within their eBPF programs where they have more control over verifier limits. For raw detection (flag DNS queries from unexpected processes), the sendto tracepoint without payload parsing is enough.</p>
<p><strong><code class="" data-line="">sendto</code> fires for all UDP, not just DNS.</strong> Filter on the destination port. The destination address structure is at <code class="" data-line="">args-&gt;addr</code> — port is in network byte order at bytes 2–3 of the <code class="" data-line="">sockaddr_in</code> structure. The filtering in the examples above is correct for port 53; double-check if you&#8217;re on a cluster that uses a non-standard DNS port.</p>
<p><strong>CoreDNS pods will appear in your DNS query trace — that&#8217;s expected.</strong> CoreDNS makes upstream DNS queries to resolve non-cluster domains. Filter on namespace/cgroup if you want to exclude CoreDNS from your trace.</p>
<p><strong>DNS over TCP is a separate code path.</strong> Most DNS queries are UDP. Large responses (&gt;512 bytes) or DNSSEC responses may trigger TCP fallback. The <code class="" data-line="">sendto</code> tracepoint catches UDP; for TCP DNS, you&#8217;d need <code class="" data-line="">tcp_sendmsg</code> with port 53 filtering. In practice, within-cluster DNS resolution is almost entirely UDP.</p>
<p><strong>glibc caching means not every <code class="" data-line="">getaddrinfo()</code> generates a DNS query.</strong> glibc caches resolved hostnames in the process&#8217;s memory. A service that calls <code class="" data-line="">getaddrinfo(&quot;api.example.com&quot;)</code> every 100ms may only generate a DNS query every 30 seconds (the TTL). If you&#8217;re looking for which pods are resolving a domain and see only occasional tracepoint hits, that&#8217;s expected — it&#8217;s the cache miss rate, not the access rate.</p>
<hr />
<h2 id="quick-reference">Quick Reference</h2>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>What you want</th>
<th>Command</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>All DNS queries on a node</td>
<td><code class="" data-line="">bpftrace -e &#039;tracepoint:syscalls:sys_enter_sendto { if (port == 53) ... }&#039;</code></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>DNS query count per process</td>
<td><code class="" data-line="">bpftrace -e &#039;... { @[comm] = count(); }&#039;</code></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>DNS queries from a specific process</td>
<td><code class="" data-line="">bpftrace -e &#039;... /comm == &quot;my-svc&quot;/ { ... }&#039;</code></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Map PID to pod</td>
<td><code class="" data-line="">cat /proc/&lt;pid&gt;/cgroup</code> → extract pod UID → <code class="" data-line="">kubectl get pods</code></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>DNS events with domain names (Tetragon)</td>
<td><code class="" data-line="">tetra getevents --event-types PROCESS_KPROBE</code></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>DNS policy violations (Cilium)</td>
<td><code class="" data-line="">hubble observe --verdict DROPPED --protocol DNS</code></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CoreDNS query logs</td>
<td><code class="" data-line="">kubectl logs -n kube-system -l k8s-app=kube-dns</code></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>DNS signal</th>
<th>What it indicates</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>New domain, immediate TCP connect</td>
<td>Possible C2 resolution</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>50+ queries/second from one PID</td>
<td>DNS tunneling candidate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Query to non-cluster domain from batch job</td>
<td>Unusual — investigate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NXDOMAIN responses at high rate</td>
<td>Misconfiguration or DGA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Queries from PID not matching any known binary</td>
<td>Injected process</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr />
<h2 id="key-takeaways">Key Takeaways</h2>
<ul>
<li>DNS observability in Kubernetes with eBPF uses the <code class="" data-line="">sendto</code> tracepoint — the hook fires when the process issues the syscall, before the packet leaves the node, giving you PID-level attribution with no sidecar</li>
<li>CoreDNS metrics show aggregate DNS health; kernel tracepoints show which pod and which process made each query — the attribution gap between the two is where anomaly detection lives</li>
<li>The DNS syscall path goes: <code class="" data-line="">getaddrinfo()</code> → glibc → <code class="" data-line="">sendto()</code> syscall → kernel UDP stack → CoreDNS. eBPF hooks fire at the <code class="" data-line="">sendto()</code> boundary</li>
<li>A compromised workload&#8217;s first observable action is almost always a DNS query; tracepoint-based DNS observability catches it at the kernel level, ahead of any application log</li>
<li>glibc caches resolved names, so tracepoint hit rate reflects cache misses, not <code class="" data-line="">getaddrinfo()</code> call rate — account for this when baselining</li>
<li>Full domain name extraction requires DNS wire-format parsing; Tetragon and Pixie do this in their eBPF programs; bpftrace one-liners detect the query event without the domain string</li>
</ul>
<hr />
<h2 id="whats-next">What&#8217;s Next</h2>
<p>DNS observability tells you what a workload is resolving. EP12 answers what happens when you want to stop a workload from doing something — not detect it after the fact, but prevent it at the syscall boundary before it completes.</p>
<p>LSM hooks and Tetragon&#8217;s kill path enforce at the kernel level. When the kernel enforces, the process never gets the return value from the syscall. There is no &#8220;detect and respond&#8221; window — the action simply does not complete. That is a structurally different security posture from anything a sidecar or userspace agent can provide.</p>
<p><em>Next: <a href="/ebpf-lsm-tetragon-runtime-security/">LSM and Tetragon — when the kernel says no</a></em></p>
<p>Get EP12 in your inbox when it publishes → <a href="https://linuxcent.com/subscribe">linuxcent.com/subscribe</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_button_mastodon" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/mastodon?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Flinuxcent.com%2Febpf-dns-observability-kubernetes%2F&amp;linkname=DNS%20at%20the%20Kernel%20Level%20%E2%80%94%20What%20Your%20Pods%20Are%20Actually%20Resolving" title="Mastodon" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_email" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/email?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Flinuxcent.com%2Febpf-dns-observability-kubernetes%2F&amp;linkname=DNS%20at%20the%20Kernel%20Level%20%E2%80%94%20What%20Your%20Pods%20Are%20Actually%20Resolving" title="Email" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_whatsapp" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/whatsapp?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Flinuxcent.com%2Febpf-dns-observability-kubernetes%2F&amp;linkname=DNS%20at%20the%20Kernel%20Level%20%E2%80%94%20What%20Your%20Pods%20Are%20Actually%20Resolving" title="WhatsApp" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_reddit" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/reddit?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Flinuxcent.com%2Febpf-dns-observability-kubernetes%2F&amp;linkname=DNS%20at%20the%20Kernel%20Level%20%E2%80%94%20What%20Your%20Pods%20Are%20Actually%20Resolving" title="Reddit" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_x" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/x?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Flinuxcent.com%2Febpf-dns-observability-kubernetes%2F&amp;linkname=DNS%20at%20the%20Kernel%20Level%20%E2%80%94%20What%20Your%20Pods%20Are%20Actually%20Resolving" title="X" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_linkedin" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/linkedin?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Flinuxcent.com%2Febpf-dns-observability-kubernetes%2F&amp;linkname=DNS%20at%20the%20Kernel%20Level%20%E2%80%94%20What%20Your%20Pods%20Are%20Actually%20Resolving" title="LinkedIn" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_copy_link" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/copy_link?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Flinuxcent.com%2Febpf-dns-observability-kubernetes%2F&amp;linkname=DNS%20at%20the%20Kernel%20Level%20%E2%80%94%20What%20Your%20Pods%20Are%20Actually%20Resolving" title="Copy Link" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save addtoany_share" href="https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Flinuxcent.com%2Febpf-dns-observability-kubernetes%2F&#038;title=DNS%20at%20the%20Kernel%20Level%20%E2%80%94%20What%20Your%20Pods%20Are%20Actually%20Resolving" data-a2a-url="https://linuxcent.com/ebpf-dns-observability-kubernetes/" data-a2a-title="DNS at the Kernel Level — What Your Pods Are Actually Resolving"></a></p><p>The post <a href="https://linuxcent.com/ebpf-dns-observability-kubernetes/">DNS at the Kernel Level — What Your Pods Are Actually Resolving</a> appeared first on <a href="https://linuxcent.com">Linuxcent</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://linuxcent.com/ebpf-dns-observability-kubernetes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1840</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: linuxcent.com @ 2026-08-26 10:13:43 by W3 Total Cache
-->